The Tea Party movement has been getting much attention and when one goes to “nail down” just what the Tea Party is all about, it gets difficult. Seems they’re all over the map, both geographically and politically. That’s not easy to digest, but the movement is mostly in need of more definition.

The movement has gotten the media attention. The defining moments for the Tea Party has been done on the fly with puzzling results. Take Ron Paul for example. So much for being left on the shelf to collect dust. Recently he has gained more support which lacks a political party foundation. His supporters seen to want it that way. Well and good, however can Paul’s support continue to lift him to the White House?  Most likely no, because there is too much fragmentation. Is Paul the candidate to bond that support together and keep it together? I’ll let you answer that.

Republican PAC’s are getting money to the Tea Party movement. This shows that a party structure is waiting on the sidelines to jump right in. That’s fine, however buyer beware. The very core of the movement are form those who are turned off by the political party system and feel it’s time for change. When more party people step in they might get a rude awakening. We’ll have to see what transpires after the Tea Party Tour ends later this spring.

Sara Robinson wrote an interesting article on ourfuture.org that plainly “populist” might be a wrong term to use in describing the Tea Party. When you read it be aware that politics has a tendency to work in orbits that can spin seemingly out of control; if not “tamed” for a forward movement.